'El regreso de D. Quijote' de Chesterton. Tradición y utopía
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/anacervantinos.2005.013Keywords:
Chesterton, influence, idealism, realism, madness, utopiaAbstract
The Return of D. Quixote, 1926, consummates a stage in Chesterton's life that the critics have called the quixotic period. The departing point for this time period was an essay called The divine parody of D. Quixote (1901) in which the author interprets Cervantes' novel as a performance of the combat between idealism and realism. Sancho Panza portrays the image of the knight embodying common sense and opposed to certain madness that we have come to consider as normal in the world we live. This paradox had been already subject of a witty analysis in the utopian novel The Napoleon of Notting Hill of 1904. It is also explored in other relevant works like the poem entitled Lepanto of 1912. It is only in the Weekly's Review issues where D. Quixote becomes the advocate of the distributionist cause and the return to a medieval society as a symbol of the revival of the knight's virtuousness and of its inspiring prototype, the utopia of a Christian society.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2005 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b67b2/b67b296c4d3b028c918eaf7bf864d9ab589a7b44" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.